Chris, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I was talking with Greg, and I think I'm OK with org.apacheextras as > the namespace.
Thanks for your patience :-) I wasn't trying to discount your proposals, and I appreciate that you'd created a patch--I was just trying to understand the reasons you disliked the org.apacheextras.* proposal. If your conversation with Greg is easy to summarize, it might be worth documenting why this proposal ended up being ok for you--but if you just want to get back to writing code, that's fine too :-) > It sounds like Noirin thought that was cool and so did Mark S. > Are folks here on ComDev cool with that namespace for our Extras > projects? If so, I'll update my COMDEV-65 patch with docs stating that > and document it and move forward. Tiny nit on the patch: we have project management committees, not project committees :-) (Hey, at least I read it, right? :-)) > I'm also of the mindset that the PMC should be the ones saying > if they are OK with my oodt-pushpull-plugins Extras name and > to me it should be fine if the PMC is OK with that. I can update > the FAQ/guidelines to state that. My very vague recollection from when Apache Extras was booting up was that we didn't want "official PMC-sanctioned projects" to have special status there. I'd give this one a day or two to collect more input before updating anything. Noirin
