Ultimately I think the only way you can move the needle on this is by 1. talking about it like you did
2. making it happen - e.g. you could just start with your own project, agree in your PM group to mirror to gitlab and then adapt your processes In the end .. imho it doesnt matter where you mirror to ... the bigger question is what you do with your workflow in terms of accepting pull requests and such. And there is definitely a danger of becoming dependent on a commercial entity (MS/Github) .. but then you already e,g. use JIRA for your issue tracking now.. Manfred Julian Foad wrote on 2019-02-18 06:30: > Thanks for your comments, Rich. > > Re. "owning our data": we do own our source code but what about all the > conversational metadata in GH? In the Subversion project we have a GH mirror > of > the code but pull requests and code comments etc. in GH aren't even copied to > the Subversion PMC mailing lists, apart from the first message in each PR > which > is; these are known limitations. > > Re. "infra": infra is here to create and manage the infra to support the > projects' wants and needs; I am speaking here to the community to try to > influence their wants and needs. > > - Julian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
