I don't like "maintainer" here, a PMC member has a LOT more
responsibility than the name implies IMO.

"Maintainer" and "Contributor" feel almost interchangeable where a
contributor might be a one-off and a maintainer more active. But we're
splitting hair here IMO.

Gary

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 3:17 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I totally get the problem. I think if we can find a suitable title for PMC 
> Member we could socialize it in a few years. Should have done this years ago.
>
> But "Maintainer" does not do it for me. Keep looking...
>
> Craig
>
> > On Mar 23, 2024, at 01:47, tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Random thought.
> >
> > You may find people not a native English speaker keep calling a PMC Member
> > of Apache Foo "Foo PMC".
> >
> > We correct it so many times and spread the knowledge on list. But the trend
> > I observed doesn't change and IMO it's hopeless to change.
> >
> > Since people tend to use a short ref and "committer" gives a one-word
> > identifier first image, I'm trying to propose officially alias "PMC Member"
> > as "Maintainer" so that our wording is aligned.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
>
> Craig L Russell
> c...@apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to