Sorry missed that one :) Thanks, -- Marica
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live > site. > > BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page? > > - Brett > > On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > > > I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn > > site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I > > visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all. > > > > http://continuum.apache.org/ > > http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5 > > > > > > Can anyone help me with this :) > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Marica > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> The vote has passed with the following results: > >> > >> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica > >> 1 non-binding: Brent > >> No -1s and 0s > >> > >> > >> I'll finalize the release. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> Marica > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for Beta. > >>> > >>> - verified signatures and checksums > >>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed > >>> build scenarios > >>> > >>> - Marica > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 for Beta. > >>>> > >>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I > was > >>>> able to run and build a project. > >>>> > >>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - > >>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this > before > >>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. > >>>> > >>>> - Brett > >>>> > >>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi > >>>>> > >>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. > >>>>> > >>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release > >>>> notes > >>>>> here: > >>>>> > >>>> > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 > >>>>> > >>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, > >>>> can be > >>>>> downloaded here: > >>>>> > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> < > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> < > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> < > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... > >>>>> > >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Marica > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'll start the release today :-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop > me > >>>>>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on > >>>> the > >>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a > problem > >>>>>>> there too. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA > >>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's > already > >>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 > >>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be > the > >>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Wendy > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Brett Porter > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > >
