No problem. Hope you're feeling better now :)
-- Marica On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Emmanuel Venisse < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Marica for this release. > I'm sorry I couldn't test and vote for it because I was at hospital. > > Emmanuel > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The vote has passed with the following results: > > > > +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica > > 1 non-binding: Brent > > No -1s and 0s > > > > > > I'll finalize the release. > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Marica > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 for Beta. > > > > > > - verified signatures and checksums > > > - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed > > > build scenarios > > > > > > - Marica > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 for Beta. > > >> > > >> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I > > was > > >> able to run and build a project. > > >> > > >> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - > > >> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this > > before > > >> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. > > >> > > >> - Brett > > >> > > >> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi > > >> > > > >> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. > > >> > > > >> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release > > notes > > >> > here: > > >> > > > >> > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 > > >> > > > >> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, > > can > > >> be > > >> > downloaded here: > > >> > > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > < > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > < > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > < > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ > > >> > > > >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. > > >> > > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... > > >> > > > >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > -- > > >> > Marica > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I'll start the release today :-) > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse > > >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop > > me > > >> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on > > the > > >> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a > problem > > >> >>> there too. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA > > >> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's > already > > >> >>> been four months since 1.3.4. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 > > >> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be > > the > > >> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -- > > >> >>> Wendy > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Brett Porter > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
