I honestly don't like reply-all because of context. I already have problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, that can only be compounded by them actually being sent to a single person instead of read by a group.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> wrote: > There used to be a "Reply-To" header, telling the MUA to reply to " > [email protected]". It looks like that was removed just a few days > ago > (I see it on messages from Oct 2, but not from Oct 3) > > I've no idea why it changed, or who did it, but I'm certain that's the > difference. > > Ian > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Soref <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Personally, I don't mind. My mail client has a (prominent) reply all > > button. The previous configuration of this list just poisoned my mail > > client -- resulting in Person <[email protected]> and such. >
