For those using gmail, you can change your default reply mode to Reply-all in settings, and that will workaround this issue.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > I honestly don't like reply-all because of context. I already have > problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, that can > only be compounded by them actually being sent to a single person instead > of read by a group. > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > There used to be a "Reply-To" header, telling the MUA to reply to " > > [email protected]". It looks like that was removed just a few days > > ago > > (I see it on messages from Oct 2, but not from Oct 3) > > > > I've no idea why it changed, or who did it, but I'm certain that's the > > difference. > > > > Ian > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Soref <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Personally, I don't mind. My mail client has a (prominent) reply all > > > button. The previous configuration of this list just poisoned my mail > > > client -- resulting in Person <[email protected]> and such. > > >
