Damn it, did it again ...
Issue created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8442

@purplecabbage
risingj.com

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds like this happened at the same time the unsubscribe info was added.
> Time to open another INFRA ticket?
> On Oct 7, 2014 2:20 PM, "Homer, Tony" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I guess some admin probably already knows this, but I was curious so I
> > poked around for information.
> >
> > According to the Apache Mailing Lists page
> > (http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html), Apache mailing
> lists
> > use ezmlm:
> > http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/
> >
> > Here is the ezmlm FAQ page for setting reply-to:
> >
> http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/faq/Setting-Reply_002dTo-list_0040host.html#Set
> > ting-Reply_002dTo-list_0040host
> >
> >
> > The subversion mailing list guide actually discusses pros and cons of
> > overriding reply-to, so it seems like it must be possible to adjust on a
> > per list basis:
> >
> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html#reply
> > ing
> >
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > On 10/7/14, 3:00 PM, "Jesse" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >I think what we want is the reply-to dev@apache header
> > >How do we get it back?
> > >
> > >@purplecabbage
> > >risingj.com
> > >
> > >On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> For those using gmail, you can change your default reply mode to
> > >>Reply-all
> > >> in settings, and that will workaround this issue.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I honestly don't like reply-all because of context.  I already have
> > >>> problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, that
> > >>>can
> > >>> only be compounded by them actually being sent to a single person
> > >>>instead
> > >>> of read by a group.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > There used to be a "Reply-To" header, telling the MUA to reply to "
> > >>> > [email protected]". It looks like that was removed just a few
> > >>>days
> > >>> > ago
> > >>> > (I see it on messages from Oct 2, but not from Oct 3)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I've no idea why it changed, or who did it, but I'm certain that's
> > >>>the
> > >>> > difference.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Ian
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Soref <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > ?Personally, I don't mind. My mail client has a (prominent) reply
> > >>>all
> > >>> > > button. The previous configuration of this list just poisoned my
> > >>>mail
> > >>> > > client -- resulting in Person <[email protected]> and
> such.
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to