Yeah! INFRA fixed it, no idea why it happened ... Note: if you are replying to this email, you may still need to reply-all
@purplecabbage risingj.com On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > Damn it, did it again ... > Issue created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8442 > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds like this happened at the same time the unsubscribe info was added. >> Time to open another INFRA ticket? >> On Oct 7, 2014 2:20 PM, "Homer, Tony" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I guess some admin probably already knows this, but I was curious so I >> > poked around for information. >> > >> > According to the Apache Mailing Lists page >> > (http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html), Apache mailing >> lists >> > use ezmlm: >> > http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/ >> > >> > Here is the ezmlm FAQ page for setting reply-to: >> > >> http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/faq/Setting-Reply_002dTo-list_0040host.html#Set >> > ting-Reply_002dTo-list_0040host >> > >> > >> > The subversion mailing list guide actually discusses pros and cons of >> > overriding reply-to, so it seems like it must be possible to adjust on a >> > per list basis: >> > >> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html#reply >> > ing >> > >> > >> > Tony >> > >> > On 10/7/14, 3:00 PM, "Jesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >I think what we want is the reply-to dev@apache header >> > >How do we get it back? >> > > >> > >@purplecabbage >> > >risingj.com >> > > >> > >On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> For those using gmail, you can change your default reply mode to >> > >>Reply-all >> > >> in settings, and that will workaround this issue. >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> I honestly don't like reply-all because of context. I already have >> > >>> problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, >> that >> > >>>can >> > >>> only be compounded by them actually being sent to a single person >> > >>>instead >> > >>> of read by a group. >> > >>> >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ian Clelland < >> [email protected]> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> > There used to be a "Reply-To" header, telling the MUA to reply to >> " >> > >>> > [email protected]". It looks like that was removed just a >> few >> > >>>days >> > >>> > ago >> > >>> > (I see it on messages from Oct 2, but not from Oct 3) >> > >>> > >> > >>> > I've no idea why it changed, or who did it, but I'm certain that's >> > >>>the >> > >>> > difference. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Ian >> > >>> > >> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Soref <[email protected] >> > >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > ?Personally, I don't mind. My mail client has a (prominent) >> reply >> > >>>all >> > >>> > > button. The previous configuration of this list just poisoned my >> > >>>mail >> > >>> > > client -- resulting in Person <[email protected]> and >> such. >> > >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> > >
