[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COR-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14281865#comment-14281865
]
Dennis E. Hamilton commented on COR-10:
---------------------------------------
OK, that helps a lot.
I don't know what it means to speak of big difference in system demand? Apart
from tech-press reports, is there some way we could quantitatively deal with
this? A lot of reports about browser performance have to do with number of
tabs open, that sort of thing, and don't apply to the use-case of this issue.
With regard to using the hosted libraries that make a browser engine available
for local operation, I would consider the following:
1. What is already available on the platform without having to make the user
do anything or change how they operate? (I notice many Linux distros include
Chrome out of the box, which has not even been mentioned, while others include
Firefox in the basic installation.)
2. Are we expecting users to change their browser or can these be transparent
to whatever the user preference is for browsing as opposed to a local app that
runs in a browser-implemented host framework?
[PS: It is probably confusing to refer to all of this as "webkit" since webkit
is a specific initiative that is, evidently, now exclusively supported by Apple
since Google is now doing something else. I haven't followed how other browser
producers have dealt with this and who is playing on what team.]
> Port to linux (using webkit and Firefox)
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: COR-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COR-10
> Project: Corinthia
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Consumers - general, DocFormats - platform
> Environment: source
> Reporter: jan iversen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> Title says it all
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
