On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2009, at 20:19, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 3 Aug 2009, at 19:37, Paul Davis wrote: >>> >>>> Either way, perhaps we should poll the community and see what the >>>> general consensus would be for respecting an _id or _rev in the POST >>>> body? >>> >>> “Be strict in what you send, but generous in what you receive” — The >>> Internets >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >> >> Does that mean I should write a patch to respect _id/_rev members? > > Oh sorry, I didn't mean to assign any patches :) > > I remember stumbling over this at least twice in the (distant) past. I > prefer the forced PUT, but then I'm also the one to argue intuitive APIs. > Considering no downsides (usually Damien adds or leaves out features for a > reason), I don't see anything wrong with Brian's proposal. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > >
Its on the white board. I'll send a proposal to user@ and see what a more general audience thinks. Paul
