On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 20:27, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: > I remember stumbling over this at least twice in the (distant) past. I > prefer the forced PUT, but then I'm also the one to argue intuitive APIs. > Considering no downsides (usually Damien adds or leaves out features for a > reason), I don't see anything wrong with Brian's proposal.
I also agree with Brian's proposal. I think per the spec the server can still use a resource component the client proposed in a POST, it's just not obliged to do so. Cheers, Dirkjan
