On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2009, at 22:40, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 3 Aug 2009, at 21:13, Paul Davis wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3 Aug 2009, at 20:19, Paul Davis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3 Aug 2009, at 19:37, Paul Davis wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either way, perhaps we should poll the community and see what the >>>>>>>> general consensus would be for respecting an _id or _rev in the POST >>>>>>>> body? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> “Be strict in what you send, but generous in what you receive” — The >>>>>>> Internets >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does that mean I should write a patch to respect _id/_rev members? >>>>> >>>>> Oh sorry, I didn't mean to assign any patches :) >>>>> >>>>> I remember stumbling over this at least twice in the (distant) past. I >>>>> prefer the forced PUT, but then I'm also the one to argue intuitive >>>>> APIs. >>>>> Considering no downsides (usually Damien adds or leaves out features >>>>> for >>>>> a >>>>> reason), I don't see anything wrong with Brian's proposal. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Jan >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Its on the white board. I'll send a proposal to user@ and see what a >>>> more general audience thinks. >>> >>> Per ASF rules, user@ has no voice here :) But feel free to invite them >>> over >>> to dev@ :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >> >> I thought §4.1.2 listed consultation with the project's user mailing >> list as a precondition for considering a matters ready for binding >> discussion in the event that any given argument lacked technical merit >> to be immediately obvious in superiority. > > Sorry, just relaying what I've been beaten over the head with heavily :) > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > > >
:) No worries. Just poking fun at rules.
