On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 20:27, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote: >> I remember stumbling over this at least twice in the (distant) past. I >> prefer the forced PUT, but then I'm also the one to argue intuitive APIs. >> Considering no downsides (usually Damien adds or leaves out features for a >> reason), I don't see anything wrong with Brian's proposal. > > I also agree with Brian's proposal. I think per the spec the server > can still use a resource component the client proposed in a POST, it's > just not obliged to do so. >
Agree. +1 on respecting _id and _rev on docs POSTed to /db/ > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couch.io
