Shouldn't this be 1.2? On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote:
> All, > > I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that > I'd like to see in a release one of these days. > > What should be in 1.1? When should we release it? > > FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1; > > 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments. > 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon. > 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers. > > I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1; > > 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed > certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since > this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch > upstream as well. > > B.
