Seriously... ;)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, crap. My bad! Haha. I was thinking 1.0.2! > > Of all people to get this wrong... > > On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:29, Robert Newson wrote: > >> why 1.2? >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Shouldn't this be 1.2? >>> >>> On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that >>>> I'd like to see in a release one of these days. >>>> >>>> What should be in 1.1? When should we release it? >>>> >>>> FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1; >>>> >>>> 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments. >>>> 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon. >>>> 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers. >>>> >>>> I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1; >>>> >>>> 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed >>>> certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since >>>> this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch >>>> upstream as well. >>>> >>>> B. >>> >>> > >
