I'm tired... It's almost midnight! :p On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:41, Robert Newson wrote:
> Seriously... ;) > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, crap. My bad! Haha. I was thinking 1.0.2! >> >> Of all people to get this wrong... >> >> On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:29, Robert Newson wrote: >> >>> why 1.2? >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Shouldn't this be 1.2? >>>> >>>> On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote: >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that >>>>> I'd like to see in a release one of these days. >>>>> >>>>> What should be in 1.1? When should we release it? >>>>> >>>>> FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1; >>>>> >>>>> 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments. >>>>> 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon. >>>>> 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers. >>>>> >>>>> I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1; >>>>> >>>>> 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed >>>>> certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since >>>>> this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch >>>>> upstream as well. >>>>> >>>>> B. >>>> >>>> >> >>
