Oh, crap. My bad! Haha. I was thinking 1.0.2! Of all people to get this wrong...
On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:29, Robert Newson wrote: > why 1.2? > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Shouldn't this be 1.2? >> >> On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that >>> I'd like to see in a release one of these days. >>> >>> What should be in 1.1? When should we release it? >>> >>> FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1; >>> >>> 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments. >>> 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon. >>> 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers. >>> >>> I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1; >>> >>> 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed >>> certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since >>> this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch >>> upstream as well. >>> >>> B. >> >>
