Thanks! I thought this was the consensus, but wasn't positive. Much
simpler workflow.
Wendall
On 05/31/2013 08:51 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other
branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted.
B.
On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase, etc.
However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to
couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for this,
or a clear summary of decisions made?
Thanks,
Wendall
