This thread is concluded. :) I meant the "[DISCUSS] Git workflow" thread.
On 4 June 2013 18:41, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > What's not concluded in this thread? > > B. > > > On 4 June 2013 18:04, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bob, are you able to help drive the Git thread to conclusion? We need to > > clarify this and document it. Think a lot people are confused right now > > since it seems everything is in the air. > > > > > > On 31 May 2013 16:51, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other > >> branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted. > >> > >> B. > >> > >> On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase, > etc. > >> > However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to > >> > couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for > >> this, > >> > or a clear summary of decisions made? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Wendall > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > NS > -- NS
