What's not concluded in this thread? B.
On 4 June 2013 18:04, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, are you able to help drive the Git thread to conclusion? We need to > clarify this and document it. Think a lot people are confused right now > since it seems everything is in the air. > > > On 31 May 2013 16:51, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other >> branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted. >> >> B. >> >> On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase, etc. >> > However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to >> > couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for >> this, >> > or a clear summary of decisions made? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Wendall >> > > > > -- > NS
