Bob, are you able to help drive the Git thread to conclusion? We need to clarify this and document it. Think a lot people are confused right now since it seems everything is in the air.
On 31 May 2013 16:51, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other > branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted. > > B. > > On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase, etc. > > However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to > > couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for > this, > > or a clear summary of decisions made? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wendall > -- NS
