Hi Dan,
Yes, we are looking into this (not specifically related to the plugin but to
CXF as a whole). It was briefly
discussed on the mailing list, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7600
has been created, I am planning
to start working on it shortly if there are no objections. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
DK> I guess the question is: does anyone know what would be needed for the
cxf-xjc-runtime artifact (and maybe others)
DK> to have the needed module name or whatever to work better on Java 9/10? I
haven’t looked. If we are looking into Java9/10 things, might be good to also
look at.
DK> That said, I wouldn’t say it’s critical and thus doesn’t need to hold
things up.
DK> Dan
>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Sure it makes sense. Is there anything else anyone wants to fixed in the
>> next release?
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Freeman adapted cxf-xjc-plugin to work with Java 10. What about releasing
>>> this so that users have a working release version?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>
>> Talend Community Coder
>> http://coders.talend.com
