Hi guys, some time ago my question was just to get cxf-xjc-plugin released. That should be easy.
Romain had some concerns with module names https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/790a276b4a7b3d977f5cb1abdc764a0529324b286fba915d19352afb@%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E but I think for the plugin we could just adjust the manifest and go ahead, right? Cheers Dennis On 2018/04/09 04:10:36, Freeman Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Yeah, add automatic-module-name in MANIFEST is a good start that CXF can > eventually move to module-path way. > > Since CXF is actually already OSGi module based, we won’t run into such > “split-package” issue in CXF, follow the common rule(root package name) to > add automatic-module-name in each CXF module make sense to us for now. > －－－－－－－－－－－－－ > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Yes, we are looking into this (not specifically related to the plugin but > > to CXF as a whole). It was briefly > > discussed on the mailing list, > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7600 has been created, I am > > planning > > to start working on it shortly if there are no objections. Thanks! > > > > Best Regards, > > Andriy Redko > > > > > > DK> I guess the question is: does anyone know what would be needed for the > > cxf-xjc-runtime artifact (and maybe others) > > DK> to have the needed module name or whatever to work better on Java 9/10? > > I haven’t looked. If we are looking into Java9/10 things, might be good > > to also look at. > > > > DK> That said, I wouldn’t say it’s critical and thus doesn’t need to hold > > things up. > > > > DK> Dan > > > > > >>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Sure it makes sense. Is there anything else anyone wants to fixed in the > >>> next release? > >>> > >>> Colm. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Freeman adapted cxf-xjc-plugin to work with Java 10. What about releasing > >>>> this so that users have a working release version? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> Dennis > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh > >>> > >>> Talend Community Coder > >>> http://coders.talend.com > > > > > >
