Hi Dennis,
Haven't started work on automatic module names yet, my bad. But we certainly
could do that for
the plugin, the only thing we need to do is to agree on naming convention to
follow. Like f.e.,
just to throw some ideas: cxf.xjc, cxf.core, cxf.cdi, cxf.opentracing,
cxf.clustering, cxf.jaxrs.client,
cxf.jaxrs.frontend, ... What do you think, guys?
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
DK> Hi guys,
DK> some time ago my question was just to get cxf-xjc-plugin released. That
should be easy.
DK> Romain had some concerns with module names
DK>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/790a276b4a7b3d977f5cb1abdc764a0529324b286fba915d19352afb@%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E
DK> but I think for the plugin we could just adjust the manifest and go ahead,
right?
DK> Cheers
DK> Dennis
DK> On 2018/04/09 04:10:36, Freeman Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>> Yeah, add automatic-module-name in MANIFEST is a good start that CXF can
>> eventually move to module-path way.
>> Since CXF is actually already OSGi module based, we won’t run into such
>> “split-package” issue in CXF, follow the common rule(root package name) to
>> add automatic-module-name in each CXF module make sense to us for now.
>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－
>> Freeman(Yue) Fang
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> > On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Dan,
>> >
>> > Yes, we are looking into this (not specifically related to the plugin but
>> > to CXF as a whole). It was briefly
>> > discussed on the mailing list,
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7600 has been created, I am
>> > planning
>> > to start working on it shortly if there are no objections. Thanks!
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Andriy Redko
>> >
>> >
>> > DK> I guess the question is: does anyone know what would be needed for
>> > the cxf-xjc-runtime artifact (and maybe others)
>> > DK> to have the needed module name or whatever to work better on Java
>> > 9/10? I haven’t looked. If we are looking into Java9/10 things, might
>> > be good to also look at.
>> >
>> > DK> That said, I wouldn’t say it’s critical and thus doesn’t need to hold
>> > things up.
>> >
>> > DK> Dan
>> >
>> >
>> >>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Sure it makes sense. Is there anything else anyone wants to fixed in the
>> >>> next release?
>> >>>
>> >>> Colm.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Freeman adapted cxf-xjc-plugin to work with Java 10. What about
>> >>>> releasing
>> >>>> this so that users have a working release version?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers
>> >>>> Dennis
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>> >>>
>> >>> Talend Community Coder
>> >>> http://coders.talend.com
>> >
>> >
