+1

2013/6/3 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> it's not about focusing on JSF, it's about focusing on JSF for THIS very 
> release.
>
> The main focus of DeltaSpike is btw currently on the core and not on JSF...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, 3 June 2013, 15:31
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
>>
>> -1 for JSF support being a focus, since it makes it look like DS is a JSF
>> specific library (of course this is only my opinion).
>>
>> This was one of the benefits we had in Seam3, since all modules were at the
>> same level (solder being core of course), it didn't prefer any one
>> technology over another.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Adrian Gonzalez
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Sorry, forgot :
>>>  - EAR support.
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>>  Adrian
>>>
>>>  ________________________________
>>>   De : Adrian Gonzalez <[email protected]>
>>>  À : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>  Envoyé le : Lundi 3 juin 2013 15h18
>>>  Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
>>>
>>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>>  +1 for me too for :
>>>  - port the CODI Conversation and related scopes to DS (Group etc.)
>>>  - port the ViewAccessScope to DS
>>>
>>>
>>>  Also, didn't looked if JSF and REST bridge for DS Exception Handling
>> where
>>>  available for 0.4.
>>>
>>>  If not it would be good to have them in 0.5.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>>  ________________________________
>>>  De : titou10 titou10 <[email protected]>
>>>  À : [email protected]
>>>  Envoyé le : Lundi 3 juin 2013 14h43
>>>  Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
>>>
>>>
>>>  For us  DS v0.5 should be focused on the JSF module and particularly
>>>  on porting CODI scopes top get rid of CODI asap. ie:
>>>  - port the CODI Conversation and related scopes to DS (Group etc.)
>>>  - Enhance the WindowScope. (at least
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-374 )
>>>  - port the ViewAccessScope to DS
>>>  - Tie the current JSF CDIfied ViewScope to a new anotation that can be
>>>  used for producers (@PageScope ?) to mimic Seam2 "Page Scope".
>> Current
>>>  JSF @ViewScope annotation can only be set on classes.
>>>  Note that "PageScope" is different from CODI
>> "ViewAccessScope".
>>>  ViewAccessScope live until there are no more referenced by ANY view.
>>>  PageScope object live in one and only one view until the view is
>>>  dismissed..)
>>>  - Clean/update the JSF module documentation
>>>  Thanks
>>>
>>>  2013/6/2 hantsy <[email protected]>:
>>>  > I think the programming way to get the CDI bean via BeanProvider
>>>  > manually can be accepted...
>>>  >
>>>  > I would like the following will be added into the Apache DeltaSpike as
>>>  > soon as possible.
>>>  >
>>>  > 1. import the CDI query aka the JPA Repository API
>>>  > 2. improve the JSF scopes and Conversation support(nested, @Begin,
>> @End
>>>  > etc which are supported in Seam2), and add other Seam3 Faces
>> facilities,
>>>  > Formvalidation, inputContainer etc.
>>>  > 3. improve Security support, Authentication API for social(oAuth, etc)
>>>  > and stateless web service...and allow use multi Authenticators in one
>>>  > project. eg. /rest  REST web service  use stateless authentication(eg,
>>>  > BASIC, Base 64 encoded), other urls select a generic Authenticator.
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > Hantsy
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > On 6/1/2013 23:45, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>  >> RE Bean Validation, I agree and enthusiastically invite anyone who
>> has
>>>  an
>>>  >> itch to work on Bean Validation and CDI to come help out
>> implementing BV
>>>  >> 1.1 at Apache BVal :D
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Matt
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>  [email protected]
>>>  >>> wrote:
>>>  >>> as mentioned earlier i'm not sure about the bv parts (just
>> for
>>>  injection).
>>>  >>> therefore you just need to enable any bv 1.1 implementation
>> (via
>>>  >>> default-provider) and you get even more.
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> @thomas:
>>>  >>> the only missing parts besides that are the remaining scopes
>> (the rest
>>>  is
>>>  >>> in already).
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> imo it's way more important to finish [1].
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> regards,
>>>  >>> gerhard
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-335
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> 2013/6/1 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>> the most important feature are propably:
>>>  >>>> - finish the extended JSF scopes
>>>  >>>> - type view navigation
>>>  >>>> - injection BV artifacts
>>>  >>>>
>>>  >>>> so the most users could switch from CODI to DS. We
>> currently do not
>>>  use
>>>  >>>> more features in the most apps.
>>>  >>>>
>>>  >>>>
>>>  >>>> 2013/6/1 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>>
>>>  >>>>> Cdi query stuff would be great too
>>>  >>>>> Le 1 juin 2013 13:12, "Mark Struberg"
>> <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>  >>>>>
>>>  >>>>>> Yes should mainly be a bugfix release with only a
>> few new features.
>>>  >>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>  >>>>>> strub
>>>  >>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>  >>>>>>> From: John D. Ament
>> <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>>>>> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg
>> <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>>>>> Cc: deltaspike
>> <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013, 13:07
>>>  >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> Mark,
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> A little aggressive based on how long it took
>> to get 0.4?  Should
>>>  >>> this
>>>  >>>>> be
>>>  >>>>>> a small release then?
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> I'd like to add some level of
>> BeanValidation support in this
>>>  >>> release,
>>>  >>>>>> looks like the CODI and Seam features are pretty
>> similar; so adding
>>>  >>>>> support
>>>  >>>>>> for a ConstraintValidatorFactory that creates
>> injectable references
>>>  >>>> would
>>>  >>>>>> be a good one (I was about to kick off that
>> email).
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> John
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Mark Struberg
>> <[email protected]>
>>>  >>>>> wrote:
>>>  >>>>>>> Hi!
>>>  >>>>>>>> It's time to go for planing ds-0.5.
>>>  >>>>>>>> I'd say the release should be pretty
>> small this time. Mostly bug
>>>  >>>> fixes
>>>  >>>>>> and a few minor enhancements. And max 1 or 2
>> bigger bullet features.
>>>  >>>>>>>> The goal is to release ds-0.5 end of this
>> month.
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> A few things on the list as I remember so
>> far:
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Finish graduation and apply latest
>> changes to our Docs.
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Servlet module. Please add JIRAs which
>> feature you like to see
>>>  in
>>>  >>>>> this
>>>  >>>>>> module
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Improve the JSF module. We still miss a
>> few features from CODI
>>>  >>> and
>>>  >>>>>> seam-faces
>>>  >>>>>>>> . improve ClientWindow handling
>>>  >>>>>>>> . improve the typesafe navigation
>>>  >>>>>>>> . add @ConfigurationScoped and
>> @ViewAccessScoped
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Improve the configuration
>>>  >>>>>>>> . brainstorming about configuration
>> 'categories' as requested a
>>>  >>> few
>>>  >>>>>> times already
>>>  >>>>>>>> . ProjectStage and/or property specific
>> configuration
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> This DISCUSS will be closed in 72h. New
>> feature requests after
>>>  that
>>>  >>>>> time
>>>  >>>>>> will be handled in deltaspike-0.6 (unless they are
>> blockers).
>>>  >>>>>>>> The timeframe I would suggest:
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Implement new features during 2013-06-12
>>>  >>>>>>>> * Bugfixing and documentation until
>> 2013-06-19
>>>  >>>>>>>> * start with the release on 2013-06-23
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> Any objection, ideas, feedback?
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>  >>>>>>>> strub
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>  >
>>>  > --
>>>  > Hantsy Bai
>>>  > Blog: http://hantsy.blogspot.com
>>>  > LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/hantsy
>>>  > Github: https://github.com/hantsy
>>>
>>

Reply via email to