you are very welcome to suggest a better name. regards, gerhard
2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 <titou10.tito...@gmail.com> > Suggestion: > When porting CODI "ConversationScope" to DS, should it be possible to > NOT name this Scope "ConversationScope" > Currently, when using CODI, it is very confusing to have 2 different > scopes having the same "ConversationScope" name: the CDI one and the > CODI. Introduce a lot of confusion when communicating between > developers > Thx > > 2013/6/1 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > Hi! > > > > It's time to go for planing ds-0.5. > > I'd say the release should be pretty small this time. Mostly bug fixes > and a few minor enhancements. And max 1 or 2 bigger bullet features. > > The goal is to release ds-0.5 end of this month. > > > > A few things on the list as I remember so far: > > > > * Finish graduation and apply latest changes to our Docs. > > * Servlet module. Please add JIRAs which feature you like to see in this > module > > > > * Improve the JSF module. We still miss a few features from CODI and > seam-faces > > . improve ClientWindow handling > > . improve the typesafe navigation > > . add @ConfigurationScoped and @ViewAccessScoped > > > > > > * Improve the configuration > > . brainstorming about configuration 'categories' as requested a few > times already > > . ProjectStage and/or property specific configuration > > > > > > This DISCUSS will be closed in 72h. New feature requests after that time > will be handled in deltaspike-0.6 (unless they are blockers). > > > > The timeframe I would suggest: > > > > * Implement new features during 2013-06-12 > > * Bugfixing and documentation until 2013-06-19 > > * start with the release on 2013-06-23 > > > > > > Any objection, ideas, feedback? > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > >
