On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > ...the "deadline" (within the next 2h if I don't hear > from you) seemed a bit inappropriate...
I haven't checked this particular case but in general as per [1] a 72-hour period is considered adequate in our projects, for lazy consensus as well as votes. Once again, with svn everything is undoable anyway, but I agree that "important" changes need prior discussion. -Bertrand [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
