>> Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a build >>problem that was earlier denied
Absolutely not. That commit simply changed the case on unit tests method declarations [0]. I commented on the JIRA your issue was could not be replicated and its likely due to having a bad snapshot data version[1]. Now that its working means that you maybe stabilized your dev environment? If you still uncertain, please revert the commit and demonstrate the problem comes back. This is the last thing im going to say. I think there is still a lot of double speak going on here. For example, I very clearly asked for a commit [2] to be reverted [3] and it was repeatedly ignored, and then incorrectly changed [4], and finally my forced revert [5] cleared up the issue [6]. Yet I was the one who is doing unilateral action? I don't think people here understand how frustrating this is for me. [0] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649708 [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-122 [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1648973 [3] http://s.apache.org/Dwd [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649129 [5] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649145 [6] http://s.apache.org/X4q --- From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:11 AM Subject: Re: JIRA tickets and setting Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a build problem that was earlier denied. Should be able to run against Maven and also see, what "devicemap/trunk/devicemap/java/classifier_w3c_simple/" is about. While we had a thread yesterday about a theoretical possibility of a combined W3C compliant module, "just committing something without design, discussion or consent by anyone in the PMC" has been a repeated theme I hope soon improves for the better?;-O Werner On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Reza Naghibi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...This has been a repeated theme (statements with no references).... > > I agree that "speaking in URLs" helps tremendously. > > Doesn't always have to be full URLs but things like DMAP-1234, svn > revision 123456 and http://markmail.org/thread/bp7dgz22ojns3m3s work > fine. > > -Bertrand >
