Does mvn clean install work consistently and for everyone? (not just a single person) now, that's the important question.
It was frustrating having it break from fixing one issue (the Java 8 inconsistency) only to spot another. And the trunk of at least 24h ago with a matching data 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT simply didn't build without a failing unit test. Werner On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected] > wrote: > >> Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a > build problem that was earlier denied > > Absolutely not. That commit simply changed the case on unit tests method > declarations [0]. I commented on the JIRA your issue was could not be > replicated and its likely due to having a bad snapshot data version[1]. Now > that its working means that you maybe stabilized your dev environment? If > you still uncertain, please revert the commit and demonstrate the problem > comes back. > > This is the last thing im going to say. I think there is still a lot of > double speak going on here. For example, I very clearly asked for a commit > [2] to be reverted [3] and it was repeatedly ignored, and then incorrectly > changed [4], and finally my forced revert [5] cleared up the issue [6]. Yet > I was the one who is doing unilateral action? I don't think people here > understand how frustrating this is for me. > > [0] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649708 > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-122 > [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1648973 > [3] http://s.apache.org/Dwd > [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649129 > [5] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1649145 > [6] http://s.apache.org/X4q > > --- > > > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:11 AM > Subject: Re: JIRA tickets and setting > > Well it looks like "classifier unit test cleanup" may have fixed a build > problem that was earlier denied. > Should be able to run against Maven and also see, what > "devicemap/trunk/devicemap/java/classifier_w3c_simple/" is about. > > While we had a thread yesterday about a theoretical possibility of a > combined W3C compliant module, "just committing something without design, > discussion or consent by anyone in the PMC" has been a repeated theme I > hope soon improves for the better?;-O > > Werner > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Reza Naghibi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ...This has been a repeated theme (statements with no references).... > > > > I agree that "speaking in URLs" helps tremendously. > > > > Doesn't always have to be full URLs but things like DMAP-1234, svn > > revision 123456 and http://markmail.org/thread/bp7dgz22ojns3m3s work > > fine. > > > > -Bertrand > > > > >
