T. J. Frazier wrote:
> Clayton wrote:
>> Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
>>> Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Spotted a problem with transcluding the pages...
>>
>> It's only a problem when you're editing. It caught me up... I spent
>> some time trying to figure out what was going on :-) Every time I'd
>> edit I'd loose the TOC and I'd end up in a completely different place
>> than I started at... had me baffled until I clued in that I was editing
>> a transcluded page.
>>
> Thanks for the warning. Editing an entire page shows what's going on,
> but editing a section can get confusing, very quickly. OTOH, you only
> have to do it once :-) . . .
>
> BTW, your <math> changes in "Formula_layout" all use brace-stuff-brace,
> which gives non-italicized rendering (I'm assuming that this notation is
> actually short for "\mbox{stuff}", but what I don't know about <math>
> covers a very large wiki page on MW). For the examples in question, I
> suggest that a more "mathy" rendering would be better.
>
> And, thanks for the "negative space" fixes after \simeq. It looks
> better. I'll keep my eyes open for that.
Feel free to adjust the math syntax... that was just my first attempt at
it to try and make it read at least close to the intended output.
Cleanup is still needed. :-)
C.
--
Clayton Cornell ccorn...@openoffice.org
OpenOffice.org Documentation Project co-lead
StarOffice - Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Hamburg, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@documentation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@documentation.openoffice.org
