On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Xin Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-dubbo-ops > https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project > > Now the two projects were not activated in travis-ci.org > > Only the owner of incubator-dubbo-ops and > incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project can activate them > > How do you deal with it below? Create a issue on JIRA to handle it? > @[email protected]
I have create an Infra ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16663 > > Yong Zhu <[email protected]> 于2018年6月19日周二 下午5:54写道： >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:13 AM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On 17/06/18 16:46, Huxing Zhang wrote: >> > > Hi Community, >> > > >> > > I suggest we review the pull request merge policy. I've seen pull >> > > request merged but break the build. [1] >> > > >> > > My suggestion: >> > > >> > > 0. Change must use pull request, even for committers. >> > > 1. pull request must pass the CI build >> > > 2. pull request must be merged by another committer >> > > 3. pull request must pass review from at least one committer >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > >> > My recommendation is don't do it. >> > >> > You are creating multiple barriers to progress. Generally, social >> > controls result in a better community than technical controls. >> > >> > My suggestion is to ensure that emails about broken CI builds go to the >> > dev list and that there is a community expectation that if you break the >> > build you fix it ASAP. Further, if the build isn't fixed in a timely >> > manner then it should be acceptable for any committer to revert the >> > commit that broke the build if they wish. >> > >> +1 for this. >> >> > >> > Of course, I'm not a committer here and this is just a recommendation. >> > >> > Mark >> > -- Best Regards！ Huxing
