> it's > just a documentation issue rather than a licensing error. I think it can > be fixed in the next release.
Let’s fix it in the next version, we can continue voting now. FYI, I have wrote a blog of how to prepare and verify a Apache Release Candidate[1], only Chinese version available now. I will publish it to the website and provide a English version later. 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-website/blob/asf-site/blog/zh-cn/Prepare-an-Apache-release.md Best regards, Jun > On 8 Aug 2018, at 11:16, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Having extra information in license or notice is unfortunate but IMO it's > just a documentation issue rather than a licensing error. I think it can > be fixed in the next release. > > Thanks, > Justin > > On Wed., 8 Aug. 2018, 11:36 am jun liu, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Each package MUST provide a LICENSE file and a NOTICE file which >>> account for the package's exact content. LICENSE and NOTICE MUST NOT >>> provide unnecessary information about materials which are not bundled >>> in the package, such as separately downloaded dependencies. >>> >>> So I suggest to fix this issue and redo the vote. >>> >>> [1] >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation < >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation> >> I am not sure if we need to redo the vote for this issue, I wonder what do >> other developers think? >> >> Best regards, >> Jun >> >>> On 7 Aug 2018, at 10:38, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since we remove the hessian-lite, I suggest we remove the license info >>> in LICENSE. >>> >>> I checked ASF release policy[1], it says: >>> >>> Each package MUST provide a LICENSE file and a NOTICE file which >>> account for the package's exact content. LICENSE and NOTICE MUST NOT >>> provide unnecessary information about materials which are not bundled >>> in the package, such as separately downloaded dependencies. >>> >>> So I suggest to fix this issue and redo the vote. >>> >>> [1] >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:59 PM Jun Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hello Dubbo Community, >>>> >>>> This is a call for vote to release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) version >> 2.6.3. >>>> >>>> The release candidates (RC3): >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/2.6.3 >>>> >>>> Git tag for the release (RC3): >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/tree/dubbo-2.6.3 >>>> >>>> Hash for the release tag: >>>> 22899a4b395411496ebf03c514e7674e8073e0c3 >>>> >>>> Release Notes: >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/blob/dubbo-2.6.3/CHANGES.md >>>> >>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 28681CB1, which can be found >> in the keys file: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/KEYS >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number >> of votes are reached. >>>> >>>> Please vote accordingly: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>>> >>>> The previously RC2 vote thread: >>>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/39a25c905a46e7281b96f98a23f795c796616a9a20623c0bed8b90db@%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> The Apache Dubbo (Incubating) Team >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards！ >>> Huxing >> >>
