Hi，Huxing Your suggestion is right, I mean we should pay attention to the previously submitted issue. Close? Merge? or Add comment . We should resolve the issue that was created for a long time as soon as possible.
Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年3月7日周四 下午5:28写道： > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:12 PM LiZhenNet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi， > > I don’t think it’s a problem about number of reviewers , As time goes by, > > we will slowly ignore it,We pay more attention to the new issue. > > Are you suggesting not to set up such a hard limit? > It just looks strange to me, that 2 of the reviewer (with write > access) has approve the pull request, but it is not getting merged. > So what does the 2 approval mean? > > > > > > > > > Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年3月7日周四 下午5:04写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > When I am looking at the pull request, I found a pull request[1] got > > > approved by 2 of our reviewers(committers), but still not getting > > > merged. > > > > > > I am thinking why it is like this. Should we set up community rules > > > for thing like this? > > > For example, if a pull request has got at least N approval from > > > committers, it can be merged, where N can be discussed. The more > > > approval it need, the longer process it will take. > > > > > > For large size pull requests, the reviewer can request another one to > > > help on it. > > > > > > I would suggest to keep it small, N=1. Even the reviewer fails to > > > identify the issues, it can be fixed by sending another pull request. > > > > > > How do you think? > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3536 > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards！ > > > Huxing > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards！ > Huxing >
