Agree, a deadline is a good suggestion. It requires all committers look
into pull request more actively.

-Ian.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM yuhang xiu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, all
>
> In my opinion, both suggestions are good.
> But what I need to remind is that we should have at least one deadline to
> prevent a pr from being suspended for a long time.
>
> Thx.
>
> Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年3月8日周五 上午10:41写道:
>
> > I think we don't need such a complex rule at all. More reviewers on it,
> > more confidence it will give the author. I think there's a chance for
> > reviewers more than one looking into one pull request because this pull
> > request may look interesting to them. I don't worry too much since
> > eventually they will reach a consensus and the pull request get merged by
> > one of the reviewers. What I suggest is to make the rule simple, no pull
> > request can be merged unless it's reviewed one reviewer at least.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Ian.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:37 AM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think we don't need such a complex rule at all. More reviewers on it,
> > > more confidence it will give the author. I think there's a chance for
> > > reviewers more than one looking into one pull request because this pull
> > > request may look interesting
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:04 PM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> When I am looking at the pull request, I found a pull request[1] got
> > >> approved by 2 of our reviewers(committers), but still not getting
> > >> merged.
> > >>
> > >> I am thinking why it is like this. Should we set up community rules
> > >> for thing like this?
> > >> For example, if a pull request has got at least N approval from
> > >> committers, it can be merged, where N can be discussed. The more
> > >> approval it need, the longer process it will take.
> > >>
> > >> For large size pull requests, the reviewer can request another one to
> > >> help on it.
> > >>
> > >> I would suggest to keep it small, N=1.  Even the reviewer fails to
> > >> identify the issues, it can be fixed by sending another pull request.
> > >>
> > >> How do you think?
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3536
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards!
> > >> Huxing
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to