Hi Ethan! Yes, you are absolutely right. I haven't decided yet which way should users specify on UI that they want to authenticate via LDAP. I've added checkbox on login page (corresponding files are attached to the issue) so it's possible to test it, but haven't committed these changes (not all users will use LDAP at the end). What do you think, checkbox is acceptable solution?
Vladimir 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > Hi Vladimir, > > This looks really nice. It basically means that we can hook ESME up to an > LDAP server via properties and then users can log in via the normal > web-based UI using their LDAP credentials, right? > > Ethan > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > I've just resolved ESME-135. It would be nice if you or other guys check > > and > > test it. > > > > Vladimir > > > > 2011/4/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > > > > > @Vladimir - do you want to write another blog about direct > > > authentication via LDAP? Are other configuration / code changes > > > necessary? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > I think we can close ESME-214. Concerning ESME-135 - IMHO it also can > > be > > > > closed if direct authentication via LDAP (without container-managed > > > > authentication) isn't needed. > > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > 2011/4/14 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> Can we close > > > >> > > > >> ESME-135 Add LDAP to ESME > > > >> ESME-214 Add container-based authentication > > > >> > > > >> D. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivanov
