Ethan, I agree, most probably only one authentication method at a time will be used. I think 'ldap.enabled' property in default.props file suits our need.
Vladimir 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > Hi Vladimir, > > Cool! My impression is that this will be something the administrator > decides > and either all users will log in via LDAP or none of them will. So I think > it should be set in a property/configuration file and the UI should remain > the same (though the OpenID option should go away if we are using LDAP). > > What do you think? Are there scenarios in which a deployment would want > some > users logging in using the local accounts and some using LDAP? If so, then > my way isn't going to work. > > Cheers, > Ethan > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi Ethan! > > > > Yes, you are absolutely right. I haven't decided yet which way should > users > > specify on UI that they want to authenticate via LDAP. I've added > checkbox > > on login page (corresponding files are attached to the issue) so it's > > possible to test it, but haven't committed these changes (not all users > > will > > use LDAP at the end). What do you think, checkbox is acceptable solution? > > > > Vladimir > > > > 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > > > This looks really nice. It basically means that we can hook ESME up to > an > > > LDAP server via properties and then users can log in via the normal > > > web-based UI using their LDAP credentials, right? > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Ivanov < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > > I've just resolved ESME-135. It would be nice if you or other guys > > check > > > > and > > > > test it. > > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > 2011/4/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > @Vladimir - do you want to write another blog about direct > > > > > authentication via LDAP? Are other configuration / code changes > > > > > necessary? > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I think we can close ESME-214. Concerning ESME-135 - IMHO it also > > can > > > > be > > > > > > closed if direct authentication via LDAP (without > container-managed > > > > > > authentication) isn't needed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > 2011/4/14 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Can we close > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ESME-135 Add LDAP to ESME > > > > > >> ESME-214 Add container-based authentication > > > > > >> > > > > > >> D. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivanov
