Hi,

I just would like to inform you that I made inactive other types of
authentication (I added hidden input field to 'upw_login_form' template via
CSS selector that holds true/false value depending on whether LDAP is
enabled, replaced login form action URL so that username/password go to LDAP
module, hid open ldap id input field and signup button) when LDAP is enabled
in 'default.props' file. What do you think if it's applicable solution?

I also externalized role list that are allowed to access app to
default.props file (roles are separated by comma).

Vladimir



2011/4/25 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>

> You could try it against the Apache LDAP - I posted details in a recent
> thread
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > Perfect, I didn't see that in there. Now I just need to track down an
> LDAP
> > server to test against :-)
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Ethan,
> >>
> >> I agree, most probably only one authentication method at a time will be
> >> used. I think 'ldap.enabled' property in default.props file suits our
> need.
> >>
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> > Hi Vladimir,
> >> >
> >> > Cool! My impression is that this will be something the administrator
> >> > decides
> >> > and either all users will log in via LDAP or none of them will. So I
> >> think
> >> > it should be set in a property/configuration file and the UI should
> >> remain
> >> > the same (though the OpenID option should go away if we are using
> LDAP).
> >> >
> >> > What do you think? Are there scenarios in which a deployment would
> want
> >> > some
> >> > users logging in using the local accounts and some using LDAP? If so,
> >> then
> >> > my way isn't going to work.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Ethan
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> [email protected]
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Ethan!
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, you are absolutely right. I haven't decided yet which way
> should
> >> > users
> >> > > specify on UI that they want to authenticate via LDAP. I've added
> >> > checkbox
> >> > > on login page (corresponding files are attached to the issue) so
> it's
> >> > > possible to test it, but haven't committed these changes (not all
> users
> >> > > will
> >> > > use LDAP at the end). What do you think, checkbox is acceptable
> >> solution?
> >> > >
> >> > > Vladimir
> >> > >
> >> > > 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Vladimir,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This looks really nice. It basically means that we can hook ESME
> up
> >> to
> >> > an
> >> > > > LDAP server via properties and then users can log in via the
> normal
> >> > > > web-based UI using their LDAP credentials, right?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Ethan
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > > > >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Richard,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I've just resolved ESME-135. It would be nice if you or other
> guys
> >> > > check
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > test it.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Vladimir
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2011/4/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > @Vladimir  - do you want to write another blog about direct
> >> > > > > > authentication via LDAP? Are other configuration / code
> changes
> >> > > > > > necessary?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > D.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > I think we can close ESME-214. Concerning ESME-135 - IMHO it
> >> also
> >> > > can
> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > closed if direct authentication via LDAP (without
> >> > container-managed
> >> > > > > > > authentication) isn't needed.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Vladimir
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > 2011/4/14 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> Can we close
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> ESME-135         Add LDAP to ESME
> >> > > > > > >> ESME-214         Add container-based authentication
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> D.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> >> > > > > > > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Best Regards,
> >> > > > > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best Regards,
> >> > > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Reply via email to