You could try it against the Apache LDAP - I posted details in a recent thread
D. On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > Perfect, I didn't see that in there. Now I just need to track down an LDAP > server to test against :-) > > Ethan > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ethan, >> >> I agree, most probably only one authentication method at a time will be >> used. I think 'ldap.enabled' property in default.props file suits our need. >> >> Vladimir >> >> 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> >> > Hi Vladimir, >> > >> > Cool! My impression is that this will be something the administrator >> > decides >> > and either all users will log in via LDAP or none of them will. So I >> think >> > it should be set in a property/configuration file and the UI should >> remain >> > the same (though the OpenID option should go away if we are using LDAP). >> > >> > What do you think? Are there scenarios in which a deployment would want >> > some >> > users logging in using the local accounts and some using LDAP? If so, >> then >> > my way isn't going to work. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Ethan >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected] >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Ethan! >> > > >> > > Yes, you are absolutely right. I haven't decided yet which way should >> > users >> > > specify on UI that they want to authenticate via LDAP. I've added >> > checkbox >> > > on login page (corresponding files are attached to the issue) so it's >> > > possible to test it, but haven't committed these changes (not all users >> > > will >> > > use LDAP at the end). What do you think, checkbox is acceptable >> solution? >> > > >> > > Vladimir >> > > >> > > 2011/4/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > Hi Vladimir, >> > > > >> > > > This looks really nice. It basically means that we can hook ESME up >> to >> > an >> > > > LDAP server via properties and then users can log in via the normal >> > > > web-based UI using their LDAP credentials, right? >> > > > >> > > > Ethan >> > > > >> > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Richard, >> > > > > >> > > > > I've just resolved ESME-135. It would be nice if you or other guys >> > > check >> > > > > and >> > > > > test it. >> > > > > >> > > > > Vladimir >> > > > > >> > > > > 2011/4/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> > > > > >> > > > > > @Vladimir - do you want to write another blog about direct >> > > > > > authentication via LDAP? Are other configuration / code changes >> > > > > > necessary? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > D. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > I think we can close ESME-214. Concerning ESME-135 - IMHO it >> also >> > > can >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > closed if direct authentication via LDAP (without >> > container-managed >> > > > > > > authentication) isn't needed. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Vladimir >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 2011/4/14 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Can we close >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> ESME-135 Add LDAP to ESME >> > > > > > >> ESME-214 Add container-based authentication >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> D. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Best Regards, >> > > > > > > Vladimir Ivanov >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Best Regards, >> > > > > Vladimir Ivanov >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Best Regards, >> > > Vladimir Ivanov >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov >> >
