Hi Ethan, Sorry for the late response.
I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from MsgParser class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in its new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it. I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's neccessary right now - why not? Vladimir 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > Hi Vladimir, > > Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do > you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would > it be wiser to wait until later? > > Ethan > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update. > > > > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path > > problem: > > > http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath > > > > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this > issue. > > > > Vladimir > > > > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> > > > >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation) > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Thanks for the update. > >> > > >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to > >> ESME? > >> > > >> > D. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch. > >> >> > >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday: > >> >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2 > >> >> > >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due > to > >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ > in > >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). > See > >> >> following link for more details: > >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1<http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1> > >> >> > >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for > me > >> due > >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ). > >> >> > >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all > >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly). > >> >> > >> >> Vladimir > >> >> > >> >> 2011/7/27 <[email protected]> > >> >> > >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last > >> couple of > >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the > replacement, > >> if > >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base. > >> >>> > >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination! > >> >>> > >> >>> Imtiaz > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" < > >> [email protected] > >> >>> > > >> >>> To: <[email protected]> > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough > or > >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> [email protected]> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to > find > >> any > >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems > there's > >> no > >> >>>>> other > >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> OK - sounds good > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Vladimir > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support > has > >> >>>>>> been totally removed. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a > >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the > HTTP-based > >> >>>>>> interface. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> D. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> [email protected] > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick! > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with > >> StatsMBean > > >> >>>>>> class > >> >>>>>> > removed: > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/** > >> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/** > >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich< > >> > https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich > >> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow. > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > Vladimir > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> < > >> >>>>>> [email protected] > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> >> wrote: > >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out. > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> >> Great. > >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you > >> comment > >> >>>>>> out > >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile? > >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>>> >> >> D. > >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> >>>>>> [email protected] > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: > >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore > >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed > >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea > >> whether > >> >>>>>> >> >> > any > >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available). > >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > -- > >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards, > >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > -- > >> >>>>>> > Best Regards, > >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -- > >> >>>>> Best Regards, > >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Best Regards, > >> >> Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivanov
