Sounds good!
2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk > (hopefully this evening). > > Vladimir > > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be >> finished by the time we release 1.4. >> >> D >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Vladimir and all, >> > >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the >> > Lift 2.4 branch. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Ethan >> > >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi Ethan, >> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response. >> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from >> MsgParser >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in >> its >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it. >> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's >> neccessary >> >> right now - why not? >> >> >> >> Vladimir >> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir, >> >>> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later? >> >>> >> >>> Ethan >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update. >> >>> > >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context >> path >> >>> > problem: >> >>> > >> >>> >> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath >> >>> > >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this >> >>> issue. >> >>> > >> >>> > Vladimir >> >>> > >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> >> >>> > >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch < >> [email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of >> interest to >> >>> >> ESME? >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > D. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2 >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile >> due >> >>> to >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly >> specify _ >> >>> in >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a >> function). >> >>> See >> >>> >> >> following link for more details: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 >> < >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time >> for >> >>> me >> >>> >> due >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ). >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after >> all >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly). >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the >> last >> >>> >> couple of >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the >> >>> replacement, >> >>> >> if >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination! >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" < >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> To: <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was >> enough >> >>> or >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>> >> [email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried >> to >> >>> find >> >>> >> any >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems >> >>> there's >> >>> >> no >> >>> >> >>>>> other >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub. >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests. >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX >> support >> >>> has >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the >> >>> HTTP-based >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick! >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with >> >>> >> StatsMBean > >> >>> >> >>>>>> class >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed: >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/** >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/** >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich< >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow. >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> < >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did >> you >> >>> >> comment >> >>> >> >>>>>> out >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile? >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no >> idea >> >>> >> whether >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available). >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > -- >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards, >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> > -- >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards, >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards, >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> Best Regards, >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Best Regards, >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Vladimir Ivanov >
