I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state. Vladimir
2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance? > > D. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk. > > > > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version: > > > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110 > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111 > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114 > > > > Vladimir > > > > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <[email protected] > >написал: > > > >> Sounds good! > >> > >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: > >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk > >> > (hopefully this evening). > >> > > >> > Vladimir > >> > > >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be > >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4. > >> >> > >> >> D > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all, > >> >> > > >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required > for > >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile > fixes > >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could > merge > >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more > >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not > the > >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thoughts? > >> >> > > >> >> > Ethan > >> >> > > >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> Hi Ethan, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Sorry for the late response. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think > we > >> need > >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from > >> >> MsgParser > >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass > (in > >> >> its > >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were > slightly > >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's > >> >> neccessary > >> >> >> right now - why not? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Vladimir > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir, > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. > Do > >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or > would > >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Ethan > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update. > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated > context > >> >> path > >> >> >>> > problem: > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > >> >> > >> > http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding > >> this > >> >> >>> issue. > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > Vladimir > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and > >> punctuation) > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update. > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of > >> >> interest to > >> >> >>> >> ESME? > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > D. > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> >> >>> [email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 > >> branch. > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday: > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> > >> >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2 > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't > >> compile > >> >> due > >> >> >>> to > >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly > >> >> specify _ > >> >> >>> in > >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a > >> >> function). > >> >> >>> See > >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details: > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> > >> >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 > >> >> < > >> >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 > >> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some > >> time > >> >> for > >> >> >>> me > >> >> >>> >> due > >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ). > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version > >> (after > >> >> all > >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly). > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for > the > >> >> last > >> >> >>> >> couple of > >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the > >> >> >>> replacement, > >> >> >>> >> if > >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base. > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination! > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" < > >> >> >>> >> [email protected] > >> >> >>> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM > >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats > was > >> >> enough > >> >> >>> or > >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version. > >> >> >>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> >> >>> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also > >> tried > >> >> to > >> >> >>> find > >> >> >>> >> any > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it > seems > >> >> >>> there's > >> >> >>> >> no > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good > >> >> >>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX > >> >> support > >> >> >>> has > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might > be > >> a > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use > the > >> >> >>> HTTP-based > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < > >> >> >>> >> [email protected] > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick! > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset > with > >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed: > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/** > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/** > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich< > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> > >> >> > >> > https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> > < > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean > replacement. > >> Did > >> >> you > >> >> >>> >> comment > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile? > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D. > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov > < > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have > no > >> >> idea > >> >> >>> >> whether > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available). > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > -- > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards, > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > -- > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards, > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> -- > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards, > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> -- > >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards, > >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > -- > >> >> >>> > Best Regards, > >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> Best Regards, > >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Best Regards, > >> > Vladimir Ivanov > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vladimir Ivanov > > > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivanov
