No risk - no fun - The current version is now deployed on our cloudbees instance -- http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net
D. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state. > > Vladimir > > 2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > >> Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance? >> >> D. >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk. >> > >> > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version: >> > >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110 >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111 >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114 >> > >> > Vladimir >> > >> > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <[email protected] >> >написал: >> > >> >> Sounds good! >> >> >> >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: >> >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk >> >> > (hopefully this evening). >> >> > >> >> > Vladimir >> >> > >> >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >> > >> >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be >> >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4. >> >> >> >> >> >> D >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required >> for >> >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile >> fixes >> >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could >> merge >> >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more >> >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not >> the >> >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thoughts? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ethan >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> Hi Ethan, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think >> we >> >> need >> >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from >> >> >> MsgParser >> >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass >> (in >> >> >> its >> >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were >> slightly >> >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's >> >> >> neccessary >> >> >> >> right now - why not? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Vladimir >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir, >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. >> Do >> >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or >> would >> >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Ethan >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated >> context >> >> >> path >> >> >> >>> > problem: >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding >> >> this >> >> >> >>> issue. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Vladimir >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and >> >> punctuation) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch < >> >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update. >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of >> >> >> interest to >> >> >> >>> >> ESME? >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > D. >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >> >> >>> [email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 >> >> branch. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2 >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't >> >> compile >> >> >> due >> >> >> >>> to >> >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly >> >> >> specify _ >> >> >> >>> in >> >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a >> >> >> function). >> >> >> >>> See >> >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 >> >> >> < >> >> >> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1 >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some >> >> time >> >> >> for >> >> >> >>> me >> >> >> >>> >> due >> >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ). >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version >> >> (after >> >> >> all >> >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly). >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for >> the >> >> >> last >> >> >> >>> >> couple of >> >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the >> >> >> >>> replacement, >> >> >> >>> >> if >> >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base. >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination! >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" < >> >> >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats >> was >> >> >> enough >> >> >> >>> or >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >> >> >>> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also >> >> tried >> >> >> to >> >> >> >>> find >> >> >> >>> >> any >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it >> seems >> >> >> >>> there's >> >> >> >>> >> no >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX >> >> >> support >> >> >> >>> has >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might >> be >> >> a >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use >> the >> >> >> >>> HTTP-based >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >> >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick! >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset >> with >> >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed: >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/** >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/** >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich< >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> >> < >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean >> replacement. >> >> Did >> >> >> you >> >> >> >>> >> comment >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile? >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D. >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> < >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> [email protected] >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have >> no >> >> >> idea >> >> >> >>> >> whether >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available). >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > -- >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards, >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > -- >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards, >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards, >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > -- >> >> >> >>> > Best Regards, >> >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Best Regards, >> >> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, >> > Vladimir Ivanov >> > >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Vladimir Ivanov >
