Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC? -Alex
On 2/13/14 12:26 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Excellent. I'll find a way to switch between them and then start >>prepping >> an RC. >> >> >Cool. I will give a shot at getting the tracking to differentiate between >flex, flexjs and falcon in the meantime. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> -Alex >> >> On 2/13/14 12:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:20 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >> >> It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" >> >>when >> >> FlexJS is selected. Hi, >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> >I just added the two logos - flexjs and flex falcon. You can see them >> >here: >> > >> > >> >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-utilities.git;a=commit;h=7 >>9 >> >b81427 >> > >> >Alex, unless there are some design feedback for the logos, you are >>good to >> >go with using these in the Installer. >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Om >> > >> > >> >> The new installer's screen looks like this: >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~aharui/temp/InstallerScreenShot.pdf >> >>> >> >>> One issue with this screen is what to do when installing something >> >>>other >> >>> than the Flex SDK. For example, the above screenshot is about to >> >>>install >> >>> a FlexJS nightly build, but the logo at the top of the screen sort >>of >> >>> makes it look like it is installing a regular Flex SDK. >> >>> >> >>> It was suggested to use different logos for the different packages. >> >>> That's doable, but the Apache Flex logo is part of the application >> >>>skin. >> >>> >> >>> An alternative is to replace the word "version" in front of the >>"4.0.1" >> >>> with some sort of name like "SDK", "FlexJS", "Falcon", "FalconJX", >>etc. >> >>> >> >>> Thoughts? >> >>> -Alex >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
