On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC? > > Would be good to have that in the first RC. What if that becomes the golden one? ;-) Give me a few hours. Thanks, Om > -Alex > > On 2/13/14 12:26 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Excellent. I'll find a way to switch between them and then start > >>prepping > >> an RC. > >> > >> > >Cool. I will give a shot at getting the tracking to differentiate between > >flex, flexjs and falcon in the meantime. > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > > > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 2/13/14 12:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:20 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > > >> >> It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" > >> >>when > >> >> FlexJS is selected. Hi, > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > > >> >I just added the two logos - flexjs and flex falcon. You can see them > >> >here: > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-utilities.git;a=commit;h=7 > >>9 > >> >b81427 > >> > > >> >Alex, unless there are some design feedback for the logos, you are > >>good to > >> >go with using these in the Installer. > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >Om > >> > > >> > > >> >> The new installer's screen looks like this: > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~aharui/temp/InstallerScreenShot.pdf > >> >>> > >> >>> One issue with this screen is what to do when installing something > >> >>>other > >> >>> than the Flex SDK. For example, the above screenshot is about to > >> >>>install > >> >>> a FlexJS nightly build, but the logo at the top of the screen sort > >>of > >> >>> makes it look like it is installing a regular Flex SDK. > >> >>> > >> >>> It was suggested to use different logos for the different packages. > >> >>> That's doable, but the Apache Flex logo is part of the application > >> >>>skin. > >> >>> > >> >>> An alternative is to replace the word "version" in front of the > >>"4.0.1" > >> >>> with some sort of name like "SDK", "FlexJS", "Falcon", "FalconJX", > >>etc. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thoughts? > >> >>> -Alex > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
