I am, of course, not a lawyer, nor an expert on these matter. IMO, the key question is whether any Adobe employee wrote any code that got donated to Apache that is not available on Open@Adobe. A secondary question is whether any code that is on Open@Adobe that has an Adobe copyright can be in the Apache Flex repo.
All of the FlexUnit code on Open@Adobe appears to be under BSD. Therefore, two scenarios are "ok" 1) The code on Open@Adobe is being used without modification 2) The code was modified by DP folks. If (1) the code should really get downloaded from Open@Adobe instead of being in our repo. If (2) the code can be in our repo and the NOTICE and LICENSE need to be updated. It is important to verify that the copyright license text is not MPL. Different rules apply there. And we need to double check on whether the header can be replaced or not. -Alex On 3/24/14 3:38 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >>Are we talking about a single file here? >>https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/blob/master/FlexUnit4Test/src/UIR >>unner.mxml > >No, we are talking about the code in the tag below: > ><Adobe:TestRunnerBase /> > >Which resides here: >https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/tree/master/FlexUnit4UIListener > >It was originally written (at least primarily) by Alex Uhlmann for >FlexUnit .9. Here is a reference to one of the classes in the original >form in github: > >https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit/blob/master/FlexUnit4UIListener/src/o >rg/flexunit/flexui/data/AbstractRowData.as > >For what it's worth, the UIListener is separate from the FlexUnit 4 core >and related tech. It's just a UI for people running FlexUnit outside of >Flash Builder/IntelliJ and outside of a CI environment. If needed, we >could lose it to move things forward. > >Mike >
