At this point we are going around in circles.  Justin, if you can simply
send a PR with a short explanation of why this is important to you, maybe
they will just merge the PR.

Let's not try to game out all the possibilities beforehand.

Thanks,
Om

On Oct 6, 2016 9:49 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > IMO, you have the option of not contacting them and not adding the
> > headers.
>
> If we don’t contact them then we need to add the headers again as stated
> on legal discuss.
>
> > I think more Flex PMC members would prefer that we simply don't do
> > anything about missing headers
>
> Several PMC members has asked for the headers to be added without
> contacting the 3rd party, but as you insisted I am willing to follow
> through with this, despite the extra effort and list email it generates
>
> > try to get the IPMC to let you wear an IPMC hat.
>
> I don’t see the point as basically we will need to add the headers no
> matter what he outcome is, unless in the unlikely case they explicitly say
> not to.
>
> >  Other members of the PMC who want to co-sign your email are welcome to
> do so.
>
> IMO There’s no need for it to be that formal. Either that say it’s OK or
> we have no reply and ether way we need to add the headers.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

Reply via email to