Good point.

That’s probably the best plan.

AIUI, the HTML files there are basically just illustrating how to use the 
framework, so they don’t seem needed either.

On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:13 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is the relevant part from the license:
> =======================================
> 
> All code in any directories or sub-directories that end with *.html or
>   *.css is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International
>   4.0 License, which full text can be found here:
>   https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
> 
> As an exception to this license, all html or css that is generated by
>   the software at the direction of the user is copyright the user. The
>   user has full ownership and control over such content, including
> whether and how they wish to license it.
> 
> =======================================
> 
> We can simply use the .scss files to generate the .css files we need.  We
> should be good in that case.
> 
> Thanks,
> Om
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> Something is odd there.
>>> 
>>> Every css file I could find in that repo had an Apache header in it.
>>> 
>>> I wonder if someone forgot to update the license file at some point.
>> 
>> Or perhaps they use a tool that added a header (incorrectly) to all files?
>> 
>> It would be best to contact them and ask for clarification. Is anyone
>> willing to do that?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Justin

Reply via email to