Hi, > Justin, please see my earlier response. We dont need to worry about the > license if we are using scss to generate the css.
I would prefer that that be confirmed, this is not a minor issue like a header being missing. If we accidentally include CC source in our release it alters the terms of the Apache license, see point 2 in [1]. Legal JIRAs here [2] is the most relevant (but there are several others). This thread is where it was discussed [3] in particular [4][5]. We do still need to worry about the missing NOTICE and the missing MIT license (if we include that file) as that has nothing to do with using css/scss files. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#criteria 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-167 3. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201507.mbox/%3ccapqz87pye5c7-7cupkq5uztbmfhyposj9pwl78qu+zt-lap...@mail.gmail.com%3e 4. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201507.mbox/%3cCAFG6u8EJEYUswGw6o8RZazVaRFOzzwvmgG3R1ZT_eYjQ7=l...@mail.gmail.com%3e 5. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201507.mbox/%3cf7a0b868-df13-432e-9b50-8c11eeff8...@jagunet.com%3e
