> The wording in the license is very clear. Which part of the highlighted
> text do you have concerns with?
I have no major concerns with the text, I do have concerns with CC licensed
code in a release and just pointing that out. If a release contains no CC code
and we’re 100% sure of that then all is good.
I raised a github issue asking for clarification, after looking at a couple of
licensing issues they have had before I believe their intent was to license the
documentation under CC, not all .css and .html files, so the license text may
actually be a little misleading.
> You can double check with Legal if you want, but this is definitely not a
> blocker issue for Carlos experimenting with MDL-FlexJS integration.
Is certainly isn’t, Carlos is free to experiment away, but the issues should be
resolved before the next release is made.